Quality system for education
On this page you will find more information regarding UiS' quality system for education, the di
18 articles
Learning environment
UiS (University of Stavanger) would like to offer students a good and inclusive learning environment
Quality work in the Ph.D.-programmes
The quality assurance of the Ph.D.-educations follows the same overall principles for evaluations an
The learning environment committee
The learning environment committee are particularly responsible for the quality in the environment w
The education committee
The education committee handles cases regarding the work with quality with authority from the board.
Annual case to the board regarding the portfolio
Based on the faculties' portfolio reports, the commissioning from the board and the faculty boa
Annual managing dialogue between faculty and rector
Rector has annual strategic dialogue meetings with the faculties.
Development dialogue between faculty and pro-rector for education
The development dialogue i completed annualy by pro-rector for education, director of academic affai
The faculties' annual handling of and reporting on the portfolio
The faculty's portfolio report must contain an overall assessment of the portfolio and how it i
Development, accreditation and establisment of new degree programmes
The guidelines include establishment of all new yearly programmes and degree-programmes, including e
Periodical programme evaluation and re-accreditation
All programmes must be periodically evaluated every five years.
Evaluation, report, and revision of programmes and exchange stays
One of the goals of the quality work at UiS is to ensure the students' total learning outcomes
Quality development of supervised professional training
The quality development of the supervised professional training happens both at course- and programm
Evaluation of the course work in Ph.D.-studies
Work with quality at course level for the Ph.D.-candidates
Semester evaluation
An evaluation based on the course reports in a programme
Course report
A short summarising report after completed course.
Digital student course evaluation
Digital evaluatiom of all courses at least every third year
Dialogue with students
The dialogue with students is completed as an early dialogue in all courses between course coordinat