The quality development of the supervised professional training happens both at course- and programme level. Supervised professional training is a big part of the students' education. For the education to maintain high quality, it is necessary for the supervised professional training to meet the learning outcome goals set for it. it is therefore important to collect systematic data regarding the quality in the supervised professional training at UiS.
Supervised professional training at UiS
UiS is meant to be the link between the place of the supervised training and the students, and must accommodate for the best possible completion of supervised training.
For this to function, there must be good communication with both students and place of supervised training, and also being conscious of how UiS can contribute into the supervised training field. Supervised training must be an educational co-creating arena for students, supervised training teachers and for UiS' teachers.
It is also presumed that students having their supervised training abroad, and international students having their professional training through UiS, is included in the same quality system as the national on-campus students.
Course coordinator or supervised professional training coordindator is responsible for the evaluation of the supervised training period. The evaluation is completed digitally.
a) Student evaluation of supervised training
| Responsibility | Course coordinator/supervised professional training coordinator |
| Participants | Students |
| Form | Digital questionnaire |
| Time | After finished supervised training period |
| Frequency | Decision of the dean |
| Purpose | Collect the students' experience of supervised training |
| Documentation | Results from digital questionnaire |
b) The place of supervised training's evaluation of UiS and supervised training
| Responsibility | Course coordinator/supervised professional training coordinator |
| Participants | Place of supervised training or a collaborative organ for the places of supervised training. |
| Form | Digital questionnaire |
| Time | Decision of the dean |
| Frequency | Decision of the dean, at least once per semester |
| Purpose | Collect the place of supervised training' experience of supervised training |
| Documentation | Results from digital questionnaire |
c) UiS' evaluation of place of supervised training
| Responsibility | Course coordinator/supervised professional training coordinator |
| Participants | Representative from UiS |
| Form | Digital questionnaire |
| Time | Decision of the dean |
| Frequency | Decision of the dean, at least once per semester |
| Purpose | Collect UiS' experience of the supervised training place and period |
| Documentation | Results from digital questionnaire |
d) Dialogue between students, place of supervised training and UiS after completed supervised training and evaluation
| Ansvar | Course coordinator/supervised professional training coordinator |
| Deltakere | Students, place of supervised training or a collaborative organ for the places of supervised training and representative from UiS |
| Form | Dialogue |
| Tidspunkt | Decision of the dean, at least once per semester |
| Frekvens | Decision of the dean |
| Formål | Collect opinions and experiences from all parts in supervised training to improve the supervised professional training at UiS |
| Datagrunnlag | Results from digital questionnaire |
| Innhold | all parties have the possibility to discuss the supervised training period, and their experiences of it. Minutes from the dialogue are written and are included in the foundation for semester evaluation and course report. |
| Dokumentasjon | Minutes from dialogue |
