Dissertation and oral exam (MLIMAS)

The master's dissertation is a piece of work that is based on individual research and is presented in a form that accords with academic conventions in relation to referencing, style, register, and so forth. It discusses a topic that has been approved by a supervisor and is written under supervision. In addition to regular meetings with their supervisor, the students attend regular seminars.

Course description for study year 2024-2025. Please note that changes may occur.


Course code




Credits (ECTS)


Semester tution start


Number of semesters


Exam semester

Spring, Autumn

Language of instruction



The students produce an academic thesis based on their own research. In addition to independent work on the dissertation, the course includes a research seminar and supervision meetings, both with obligatory attendance. The students are required to submit a research proposal, regular written work to the supervisor and (together with the dissertation an individual reading list. The students will also deliver a test lecture on a given topic, based on the individual reading list,before receiving their mark.

The dissertation is a piece of academic written work, based on individual research, on a topic that has been agreed upon by the student and the supervisor. The topic should normally relate to one of the areas studied in the taught part of the course. With one of the taught modules as a starting point, the dissertation may build upon perspectives from several areas, such as linguistics, literature, didactics, history or media studies.

The dissertation should consist of 85-115 pages (12-point Times New Roman, 1.5 spacing), not including appendices and large tables. It should follow accepted academic conventions. The topic should be clearly delimited, and the principal objectives and source materials should be defined. The methodology should be adequately described, and the work placed within its context in relation to earlier research. Students are encouraged to base their work on primary data collected by themselves.

The final mark for the course is based on the dissertation, but may be adjusted up or down (by one mark only) on the basis of the oral exam.

Learning outcome


The student will gain:

  • An understanding of the main theoretical issues relevant for the field of research of her/his Master's thesis
  • Knowledge of the central literature and issues of debate within the field of research
  • An understanding of basic research ethics, including plagiarism and copyright issues as well as research involving living human participants


By the end of the course, the student will be able to:

  • Apply their knowledge to independent research work
  • Apply a range of practical and methodological skills required for their research work
  • Account for the theories and methods current within their field of research and explain their own choice of theoretical framework and methodology
  • Develop a line of argument based on their own findings
  • Present their findings as an academic thesis, following accepted convention

General competence

By the end of the course, the student will be able to:

  • Make a realistic and structured project plan
  • Work independently on a long-term project
  • Communicate their findings clearly and efficiently both in speech and writing
  • Present and discuss their work in good academic English

Required prerequisite knowledge

First year of master's studies.


Form of assessment Weight Duration Marks Aid
Dissertation and oral exam 1/1 Letter grades All

Written dissertation: 85-115 pages, 12-point Times New Roman and 1.5 spacing, not including appendices, references and large tables.After submission of the master's thesis, an oral exam will be held. This consists of two parts: (1) an oral presentation of the master's thesis by the student of 15 minutes and (2) an academic conversation/discussion between the examination committee and the student of up to 30 minutes. The examination committee grades the master's thesis before the oral exam, but gives the student the final grade after the oral presentation and the discussion have been completed. The two parts of the oral exam must be approved by the examination committee, and the grade of the master's thesis can be adjusted by one grade after the conversation. In the event of a complaint about the grading, and the grade is changed from the first assessment, the student will conduct a new oral exam.The student must have passed both parts of the examination (dissertation and oral exam) in order to receive a pass mark. There are two submission dates for theses each year, one in May and one in November. Theses cannot be submitted at any other times.

Coursework requirements

A project proposal, Supervision meetings, Seminars 75%
  • A project proposal (1,500-2,500 words) to be handed in by a specific deadline (usually in October)
  • A minimum of eight supervision meetings
  • Attendance and presentation of work in progress at a dissertation writing seminar throughout the year, with no more than 25% absence

The obligatory activities must be completed before the dissertation can be submitted. The student must have completed all the taught modules (altogether 60 sp) before submitting the dissertation.

In exceptional cases students can get exemption from parts of the seminar due to fieldwork abroad

Course teacher(s)

Course teacher:

Sonya Louise Veck

Course coordinator:

Nadine Kolb

Course teacher:

Nadine Kolb

Course teacher:

Oliver Martin Traxel

Course teacher:

Allen Clarence Jones

Course teacher:

Peter Paul Ferry

Course teacher:

Eric Dean Rasmussen

Course teacher:

Dina Lialikhova

Course teacher:

Dina Lialikhova

Course teacher:

Sonya Louise Veck

Course coordinator:

Merja Riitta Stenroos

Method of work

Individual work, supervision meetings, seminars.

Overlapping courses

Course Reduction (SP)
Dissertation (MLIHOV_1) 60

Open for

Advanced teacher education for levels 8-13 English and Literacy Studies - Master's Degree Programme

Course assessment

There must be an early dialogue between the course supervisor, the student union representative and the students. The purpose is feedback from the students for changes and adjustments in the course for the current semester.In addition, a digital subject evaluation must be carried out at least every three years. Its purpose is to gather the students experiences with the course.


Search for literature in Leganto